As many of you already realize, I proclaimed the so-called "man-made climate change" as a hoax from day one.
Back then (many, many years ago) they were calling it "global warming." But eventually the kingpins behind the scam changed the name from "global warming" to "man-made climate change" when it was proven that the earth actually wasn't getting hotter, at least in a manner that was consistent with the global warming narrative.
I still remember as a youth how government officials and pseudoscience puppets were fearmongering about "global warming." They spread similar types of catastrophic fear mongering scenarios as seen with the modern-day global warming hoax otherwise known as "climate change."
The media did its part by attempting to scare the population. We see the same general behavior today although in many ways the propaganda is much more intense and complex.
If you investigate the full history of "global warming" you will see that the establishment has been trying for decades to convince the public of this so-called imminent environmental "catastrophe" using fear.
In the USA, use of fear is a great tactic because the US government has created a fear-based society which is useful in convincing the population to support ridiculous wars and pass worrisome laws which take away individual rights and freedoms.
By creating a society based on fear you can achieve the ultimate form of population control because the people will demand things that in effect lead to more "big brother" control without their knowledge. Getting people to agree to be locked up is always much easier than forcing people into prison.
To be clear, certainly Man's actions impact the environment. That's been a reality for a long time.
But the environment is not being adversely altered by the actions of Man in a manner that is leading to some environmental "catastrophe." This is a ridiculous claim that has been forwarded by establishment shills and con artists alike, most of which lack an adequate understanding of basic science.
In fact, basic scientific reasoning itself invalidates the claims made by the "climatologist" crowd. Those who do understand science but who also support the notion of "man-made climate change" have been bought and paid for by the government and...
This article continues.
To continue viewing this entry please sign in to your Client or Member account.
Restrictions Against Reproduction: No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning, or otherwise, except as permitted under Section 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act, without the prior written permission of the copyright owner and the Publisher.
These articles and commentaries cannot be reposted or used in any publications for which there is any revenue generated directly or indirectly. These articles cannot be used to enhance the viewer appeal of any website, including any ad revenue on the website, other than those sites for which specific written permission has been granted. Any such violations are unlawful and violators will be prosecuted in accordance with these laws.
Article 19 of the United Nations' Universal Declaration of Human Rights: Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.
This publication (written, audio and video) represents the commentary and/or criticisms from Mike Stathis or other individuals affiliated with Mike Stathis or AVA Investment Analytics (referred to hereafter as the “author”). Therefore, the commentary and/or criticisms only serve as an opinion and therefore should not be taken to be factual representations, regardless of what might be stated in these commentaries/criticisms. There is always a possibility that the author has made one or more unintentional errors, misspoke, misinterpreted information, and/or excluded information which might have altered the commentary and/or criticisms. Hence, you are advised to conduct your own independent investigations so that you can form your own conclusions. We encourage the public to contact us if we have made any errors in statements or assumptions. We also encourage the public to contact us if we have left out relevant information which might alter our conclusions. We cannot promise a response, but we will consider all valid information.