I've previously shared my views on the insecure Zionist Jewish blabber mouth and self-proclaimed "Mr. Know-it-All," Mark Cuban.
In fact, I was the first person to publicly expose Cuban as a drunk in an audio back in 2015.
In that audio I also discussed some of the realities of how he obtained his money. See here.
In addition to his obvious character flaws, it appears as if Cuban might also be a sexual deviant and molester. There's certainly good reason to consider this possibility. You see, according to a recent investigation Cuban was accused of sexual assault while drunk at a night club in Portland, Oregon a few years ago.
That's right folks. DRUNK at a NIGHT CLUB!
As you'll recall, in 2015 I specifically pointed out that Cuban hangs out at night clubs in Dallas despite the fact that he's an old man with a wife and kids.
Moreover, I pointed out that every time I've seen him in clubs he's always been very drunk and acting like a fool.
I even named two of the establishments where I've spotted him.
See here for the audio from 2015. See here for the police report by the women who accused Cuban of sexual assault.
The timing of this investigation was surely inspired by the investigation of the Dallas Mavericks organization made by Sports Illustrated not long ago. According to Sports Illustrated, Cuban's Dallas Mavericks organization was a playground for all sorts of sexually deviant behavior. See here.
Do you really think I'm surprised by the allegations against Cuban or the disgusting work environment at the Dallas Mavericks organization? Hell no!
It looks like Cuban's days as owner of the Dallas Mavericks are numbered.
But don't count him out just yet. After all, he's Jewish so there's a good chance he'll receive the full support of the Jewish-owned NBA, as well as the Jewish-run media.
Remember that the media has a big stake in Cuban since he's on CNBC's scam show Shark Tank.
I've previously discussed the fact that Shark Tank is complete fiction and adds more trash to the massive and growing trash TV genre (similar to Trump's Apprentice). I've also revealed why each of the "investors" are complete losers.
See the 11:45 minute mark of the following video:
ANOTHER Media Scam: Jewish Broken Clock Robert Prechter Promoted by Jew Media as Expert
In fact, consistent with reality TV show tradition, many of the shows' investors launched their "successful" businesses only after having gained exposure from the show.
For instance, the Jewish moron Kevin O'Leary ( to all of you "geniuses" out there who think he can't be Jewish because he has an Irish name; newsflash: there are plenty of Jews with Irish names!) was a mid to low-tier financial news reporter in Canada prior to landing a spot on the CNBC show (you guessed it; because he's Jewish).
Not long after O'Leary established his presense on the show, he started a mutual fund company knowing some of the idiots who watched Shark Tank would send him their money since they thought he was some kind of amazing investment mind and business genius. After all, that's how he's positioned in that BS television show, right?
Is this fraud? Of course it is, but the media gets away with this crap all the time. And very few people seem to spot it.
Another one of the Shark Tank clowns is now pumping bitcoin. That's proof positive he's not a real investor and has no idea about what it means to be an investor.
Let's hope Cuban gets the boot. After all, former Los Angeles Clippers owner Donald Sterling was forced to sell his team a couple of years ago over stating his personal feelings in private conversations (I previously discussed the fate of Sterling in an audio a few years ago).
If you were given a dollar every time a Jewish person sexually assaulted, molested or raped members of the opposite sex, same sex, adults and minors, you would be very well off.
Why isn't the Jewish predilection for sexual deviance, porn, pedophilia, sexual assualt, and incest being discussed?
Oh, that's right. Jewish people have always "suffered," so we cannot discuss any of their crimes (laughs).
Restrictions Against Reproduction: No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning, or otherwise, except as permitted under Section 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act, without the prior written permission of the copyright owner and the Publisher.
These articles and commentaries cannot be reposted or used in any publications for which there is any revenue generated directly or indirectly. These articles cannot be used to enhance the viewer appeal of any website, including any ad revenue on the website, other than those sites for which specific written permission has been granted. Any such violations are unlawful and violators will be prosecuted in accordance with these laws.
Article 19 of the United Nations' Universal Declaration of Human Rights: Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.
This publication (written, audio and video) represents the commentary and/or criticisms from Mike Stathis or other individuals affiliated with Mike Stathis or AVA Investment Analytics (referred to hereafter as the “author”). Therefore, the commentary and/or criticisms only serve as an opinion and therefore should not be taken to be factual representations, regardless of what might be stated in these commentaries/criticisms. There is always a possibility that the author has made one or more unintentional errors, misspoke, misinterpreted information, and/or excluded information which might have altered the commentary and/or criticisms. Hence, you are advised to conduct your own independent investigations so that you can form your own conclusions. We encourage the public to contact us if we have made any errors in statements or assumptions. We also encourage the public to contact us if we have left out relevant information which might alter our conclusions. We cannot promise a response, but we will consider all valid information.