"Never argue with stupid people. They will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience." –Mark Twain
If you want to fully understand and appreciate the work of Mike Stathis, from his market forecasts and securities analysis to his political and economic analyses, you will need to learn how to think clearly if you already lack this vital skill.
For many, this will be a cleansing process that could take quite a long time to complete depending on each individual.
The best way to begin clearing your mind is to move forward with this series of steps:
1. GET RID OF YOUR TV SET, AND ONLY USE STREAMING SERVICES SPARINGLY.
2. REFUSE TO USE YOUR PHONE TO TEXT.
3. DO NOT USE A "SMART (DUMB) PHONE" (or at least do not use your phone to browse the Internet unless absolutely necessary).
4. STAY AWAY FROM SOCIAL MEDIA (Facebook, Instagram, Whatsapp, Snap, Twitter, Tik Tok unless it is to spread links to this site).
5. STAY OFF JEWTUBE.
6. AVOID ALL MEDIA (as much as possible).
The cleansing process will take time but you can hasten the process by being proactive in exercising your mind.
You should also be aware of a very common behavior exhibited by humans who have been exposed to the various aspects of modern society. This behavior occurs when an individual overestimates his abilities and knowledge, while underestimating his weaknesses and lack of understanding. This behavior has been coined the "Dunning-Kruger Effect" after two sociologists who described it in a research publication. See here.
Many people today think they are virtual experts on every topic they place importance on. The reason for this illusory behavior is because these individuals typically allow themselves to become brainwashed by various media outlets and bogus online sources. The more information these individuals obtain on these topics, the more qualified they feel they are to share their views with others without realizing the media is not a valid source with which to use for understanding something. The media always has bias and can never be relied on to represent the full truth. Furthermore, online sources are even more dangerous for misinformation, especially due to the fact that search algorithms have been designed to create confirmation bias.
A perfect example of the Dunning-Kruger Effect can be seen with many individuals who listen to talk radio shows. These shows are often politically biased and consist of individuals who resemble used car salesmen more than intellectuals. These talking heads brainwash their audience with cherry-picked facts, misstatements, and lies regarding relevant issues such as healthcare, immigration, Social Security, Medicaid, economics, science, and so forth. They also select guests to interview based on the agendas they wish to fulfill with their advertisers rather than interviewing unbiased experts who might share different viewpoints than the host.
Once the audience has been indoctrinated by these propagandists, they feel qualified to discuss these topics on the same level as a real authority, without realizing that they obtained their understanding from individuals who are employed as professional liars and manipulators by the media.
Another good example of the Dunning-Kruger Effect can be seen upon examination of political pundits, stock market and economic analysts on TV. They talk a good game because they are professional speakers. But once you examine their track record, it is clear that these individuals are largely wrong. But they have developed confidence in speaking about these topics due to an inflated sense of expertise in topics for which they continuously demonstrate their incompetence.
One of the most insightful analogies created to explain how things are often not what you see was Plato's Allegory of the Cave, from Book 7 of the Republic.
We highly recommend that you study this masterpiece in great detail so that you are better able to use logic and reason. From there, we recommend other classics from Greek philosophers. After all, ancient Greek philosophers like Plato and Socrates created critical thinking.
If you can learn how to think like a philosopher, ideally one of the great ancient Greek philosophers, it is highly unlikely that you will ever be fooled by con artists like those who make ridiculous and unfounded claims in order to pump gold and silver, the typical get-rich-quick, or multi-level marketing (MLM) crowd.
If you want to do well as an investor, you must first understand how various forces are seeking to deceive you.
Most people understand that Wall Street is looking to take their money.
But do they really understand the means by which Wall Street achieves these objectives?
Once you understand the various tricks and scams practiced by Wall Street you will be better able to avoid being taken.
Perhaps an even greater threat to investors is the financial media.
The single most important thing investors must do if they aim to become successful is to stay clear of all media.
That includes social media and other online platforms with investment content such as YouTube and Facebook, which are one million times worse than the financial media.
The various resources found within this website address these two issues and much more.
Remember, you can have access to the best investment research in the world. But without adequate judgment, you will not do well as an investor.
You must also understand how the Wall Street and financial media parasites operate in order to do well as an investor.
It is important to understand how the Jewish mafia operates so that you can beat them at their own game.
The Jewish mafia runs both Wall Street and the media. This cabal also runs many other industries.
We devote a great deal of effort exposing the Jewish mafia in order to position investors with a higher success rate in achieving their investment goals.
Always remember the following quotes as they apply to the various charlatans positioned by the media as experts and business leaders.
“Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves.” - King James Bible - Matthew 7:15
"It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled." –Mark Twain
It's also very important to remember this FACT. All Viewpoints Are Not Created Equal.
Just because something is published in print, online, or aired in broadcast media does not make it accurate.
More often than not, the larger the audience, the more likely the content is either inaccurate or slanted.
The next time you read something about economics or investments, you should ask the following question in order to determine the credibility of the source.
Is the source biased in any way?
That is, does the source have any agendas which would provide some kind of benefit accounting for conclusions that were made?
Most individuals who operate websites or blogs sell ads or merchandise of some kind. In particular, websites that sell precious metals are not credible sources of information because the views published on these sites are biased and cannot be relied upon.
The following question is one of the first things you should ask before trusting anyone who is positioned as an expert.
Is the person truly credible?
Most people associate credibility with name-recognition. But more often than not, name-recognition serves as a predictor of bias if not lack of credibility because the more a name is recognized, the more the individual has been plastered in the media.
Most individuals who have been provided with media exposure are either naive or clueless. The media positions these types of individuals as “credible experts” in order to please its financial sponsors; those who buy advertisements.
In the case of the financial genre, instead of name-recognition or media celebrity status, you must determine whether your source has relevant experience on Wall Street as opposed to being self-taught. But this is just a basic hurdle that in itself by no means ensures the source is competent or credible.
It's much more important to carefully examine the track record of your source in depth, looking for accuracy and specific forecasts rather than open-ended statements. You must also look for timing since a broken clock is always right once a day. Finally, make sure they do not cherry-pick their best calls. Always examine their entire track record.
Don't ever believe the claims made by the source or the host interviewing the source regarding their track record.
Always verify their track record yourself.
The above question requires only slight modification for use in determining the credibility of sources that discuss other topics, such as politics, healthcare, etc.
We have compiled the most extensive publication exposing hundreds of con men pertaining to the financial publishing and securities industry, although we also cover numerous con men in the media and other front groups since they are all associated in some way with each other.
There is perhaps no one else in the world capable of shedding the full light on these con men other than Mike Stathis.
Mike has been a professional in the financial industry for nearly three decades.
Alhough he publishes numerous articles and videos addressing the dark side of the industry, the core collection can be found in our ENCYCLOPEDIA of Bozos, Hacks, Snake Oil Salesmen and Faux Heroes.
Also, the Image Library contains nearly 8,000 images, most of which are annotated.
At AVA Investment Analytics, we don't pump gold, silver, or equities because we are not promoters or marketers.
We actually expose precious metals pumpers, while revealing their motives, means, and methods.
We do not sell advertisements.
We actually go to great lengths to expose the ad-based content scam that's so pervasive in the world today.
We do not receive any compensation from our content, other than from our investment research, which is not located on this website.
We provide individual investors, financial advisers, analysts and fund managers with world-class research and unique insight.
If you listen to the media, most likely at minimum it's going to cost you hundreds of thousands of dollars over the course of your life time.
The deceit, lies, and useless guidance from the financial media is certainly a large contributor of these losses.
But a good deal of lost wealth comes in the form of excessive consumerism which the media encourages and even imposes upon its audience.
You aren’t going to know that you’re being brainwashed, or that you have lost $1 million or $2 million over your life time due to the media.
But I can guarantee you that with rare exception this will become the reality for those who are naïve enough to waste time on media.
It gets worse.
By listening to the media you are likely to also suffer ill health effects through excessive consumption of prescription drugs, and/or as a result of watching ridiculous medical shows, all of which are supportive of the medical-industrial complex.
And if you seek out the so-called "alternative media" as a means by which to escape the toxic nature of the "mainstream" media, you might make the mistake of relying on con men like Kevin Trudeau, Alex Jones, Joe Rogan, and many others.
This could be a deadly decision. As bad as the so-called "mainstream" media is, the so-called "alternative media" is even worse.
There are countless con artists spread throughout the media who operate in the same manner. They pretend to be on your side as they "expose" the "evil" government and corporations.
Their aim is to scare you into buying their alternatives. This addresses the nutritional supplements industry which has become a huge scam.
Why Does the Media Air Liars and Con Men?
The goal of the media is NOT to serve its audience because the audience does NOT pay its bills.
The goal of the media is to please its sponsors, or the companies that spend huge dollars buying advertisements.
And in order for companies to justify these expenses, they need the media to represent their cause.
The media does this by airing idiots and con artists who mislead and confuse the audience.
By engaging in "journalistic fraud," the media steers its audience into the arms of its advertisers because the audience is now misled and confused.
The financial media sets up the audience so that they become needy after having lost large amounts of money listening to their "experts." Desperate for professional help, the audience contacts Wall Street brokerage firms, mutual funds, insurance companies, and precious metals dealers that are aired on financial networks. This is why these firms pay big money for adverting slots in the financial media.
We see the same thing on a more obvious note in the so-called "alternative media," which is really a remanufactured version of the "mainstream media." Do not be fooled. There is no such thing as the "alternative media." It really all the same.
In order to be considered "media" you must have content that has widespread channels of distribution. Thus, all "media" is widely distributed.
And the same powers that control the distribution of the so-called "mainstream media" also control distribution of the so-called "alternative media."
The claim that there is an "alternative media" is merely a sales pitch designed to capture the audience that has since given up on the "mainstream media."
The tactic is a very common one used by con men.
The same tactic is used by Washington to convince naive voters that there are meaningful differences between the nation's two political parties.
In reality, both parties are essentially the same when it comes to issues that matter most (e.g. trade policy and healthcare) because all U.S. politicians are controlled by corporate America. Anyone who tells you anything different simply isn't thinking straight.
On this site, we expose the lies and the liars in the media.
We discuss and reveal the motives and track record of the media’s hand-selected charlatans with a focus on the financial media.
To date, we know of no one who has established a more accurate track record in the investment markets since 2006 than Mike Stathis.
Yet, the financial media wants nothing to do with Stathis.
This has been the case from day one when he was black-balled by the publishing industry after having written his landmark 2006 book, America's Financial Apocalypse.
From that point on, he was black-balled throughout all so-called mainstream media and then even the so-called alternative media.
With very rare exception, you aren't even going to hear him on the radio or anywhere else being interviewed.
Ask yourself why.
You aren't going to see him mentioned on any websites either, unless its by people whom he has exposed.
You aren't likely to ever read or hear of his remarkable investment research track record anywhere, unless you read about it on this website.
You should be wondering why this might be.
Some of you already know the answer.
The media banned Mike Stathis because the trick used by the media is to promote cons and clowns so that the audience will be steered into the hands of the media's financial sponsors - Wall Street, gold dealers, etc.
Because the media is run by the Jewish mafia and because most Jews practice a severe form of tribalism, the media will only promote Jews and gentiles who represent Jewish businesses.
And as for radio shows and websites that either don't know about Stathis or don't care to hear what he has to say, the fact is that they are so ignorant that they assume those who are plastered throughout media are credible.
And because they haven't heard Stathis anywhere in the media, even if they come across him, they automatically assume he's a nobody in the investment world simply because he has no media exposure. And they are too lazy to go through his work because they realize they are too stupid to understand the accuracy and relevance of his research.
Top investment professionals who know about Mike Stathis' track record have a much different view of him. But they cannot say so in public because Stathis is now considered a "controversial" figure due to his stance on the Jewish mafia.
Most people are in it for themselves. Thus, they only care about pitching what’s deemed as the “hot” topic because this sells ads in terms of more site visits or reads.
This is why you come across so many websites based on doom and conspiratorial horse shit run by con artists.
We have donated countless hours and huge sums of money towards the pursuit of exposing the con men, lies, and fraud.
We have been banned by virtually every media platform in the U.S and every website prior to writing about the Jewish mafia.
Mike Stathis was banned by all media early on because he exposed the realities of the United States.
The Jewish mafia has declared war on us because we have exposed the realities of the U.S. government, Wall Street, corporate America, free trade, U.S. healthcare, and much more.
Stathis has also been banned by alternative media because he exposed the truth about gold and silver.
We have even been banned from use of email marketing providers as a way to cripple our abilities to expand our reach.
You can talk about the Italian Mafia, and Jewish Hollywood can make 100s of movies about it.
BUT YOU CANNOT TALK ABOUT THE JEWISH MAFIA.
Because Mr. Stathis exposed so much in his 2006 book America's Financial Apocalypse, he was banned.
He was banned for writing about the following topics in detail: political correctness, illegal immigration, affirmative action, as well as the economic realities behind America's disastrous healthcare system, the destructive impact of free trade, and many other topics. He also exposed Wall Street fraud and the mortgage derivatives scam that would end of catalyzing the worst global crisis in history.
It's critical to note that the widespread ban on Mr. Stathis began well before he mentioned the Jewish mafia or even Jewish control of any kind.
It was in fact his ban that led him to realize precisely what was going on.
We only began discussing the role of the criminality of the Jewish mafia by late-2009, three years AFTER we had been black-listed by the media.
Therefore, no one can say that our criticism of the Jewish mafia led to Mike being black-listed (not that it would even be acceptable).
If you dare to expose Jewish control or anything under Jewish control, you will be black-balled by all media so the masses will never hear the truth.
Just remember this. Mike does not have to do what he is doing.
Instead, he could do what everyone else does and focus on making money.
He has already sacrificed a huge fortune to speak the truth hoping to help people steer clear of fraudsters and to educate people as to the realities in order to prevent the complete enslavement of world citizenry.
Rule #1: Those With Significant Exposure Are NOT on Your Side.
No one who has significant exposure should ever be trusted. Such individuals should be assumed to be gatekeepers until proven otherwise. I have never found an exception to this rule.
Understand that those responsible for permitting or even facilitating exposure have given exposure to specific individuals for a very good reason. And that reason does not serve your best interests.
In short, I have significant empirical evidence to conclude that everyone who has a significant amount of exposure has been bought off (in some way) by those seeking to distort reality and control the masses. This is not a difficult concept to grasp. It's propaganda 101.
Rule #2: Con Artists Like to Form Syndicates.
Before the Internet was created, con artists were largely on their own. Once the Internet was released to the civilian population, con artists realized that digital connectivity could amplify their reach, and thus the effectiveness of their mind control tactics. This meant digital connectivity could amplify the money con artists extract from their victims by forming alliances with other con artists.
Teaming up with con artists leads to a significantly greater volume of content and distraction, such that victims of these con artists are more likely to remain trapped within the web of deceit, as well as being more convinced that their favorite con artist is legit.
Whenever you wish to know whether someone can be trusted, always remember this golden rule..."a man is judged by the company he keeps." This is a very important rule to remember because con men almost always belong to the same network. You will see the same con artists interviewing each other,referencing each other, (e.g. a hat tip) on the same blog rolls, attending the same conferences, mentioning their con artist peers, and so forth.
Rule #3: There's NO Free Lunch.
Whenever something is marketed as being "free" you can bet the item or service is either useless or else the ultimate price you'll pay will be much greater than if you had paid money for it in the beginning.
You should always seek to establish a monetary relationship with all vendors because this establishes a financial link between you the customer and the vendor. Therefore, the vendor will tend to serve and protect your best interests because you pay his bills.
Those who use the goods and services from vendors who offer their products for free will treated not as customers, but as products, because these vendors will exploit users who are obtaining their products for free in order to generate income.
Use of free emails, free social media, free content is all complete garbage designed to obtain your data and sell it to digital marketing firms.
From there you will be brainwashed with cleverly designed ads. You will be monitored and your identity wil eventually be stolen.
Fraudsters often pitch the "free" line in order to lure greedy people who think they can get something for free.
Perhaps now you understand why the system of globalized trade was named "free trade."
As you might appreciate, free trade has been a complete disaster and scam designed to enrich the wealthy at the expense of the poor.
There are too many examples of goods and services positioned as being free, when in reality, the customers get screwed.
Rule #4: Beware of Manipulation Using Word Games.
When manipulators want to get the masses to side with their propaganda and ditch more legitimate alternatives they often select psychologically relevant labels to indicate positive or negative impressions.
For instance, the financial parasites running America's medical-industrial complex have designated the term "socialized medicine" to replace the original, more accurate term, "universal healthcare." This play on words has been done to sway the masses from so much as even investigating universal healthcare, because the criminals want to keep defrauding people with their so-called "market-based" healthcare scam, which has accounted for the number one cause of personal bankruptcies in the USA for many years.
When Wall Street wanted to convince the American people to go along with NAFTA, they used the term "free trade" to describe the current system of trade which has devastated the U.S. labor force.
In reality, free trade is unfair trade and only benefits the wealthy and large corporations.
There are many examples on this play on words such as the "sharing economy" and so on.
Rule #5: Whenever Someone Promotes Something that Offers to Empower You, It's Usually a Scam.
This applies to the life coaches, self-help nonsense, libertarian pitches, FIRE movement, and so on.
If it sounds too good to be true, it usually is.
Unlike what the corporate fascists claim, we DO need government.
And no, you can NOT become financially independent and retire early unless you sell this con game to suckers.
Rule #6: "Never argue with stupid people. They will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience." –Mark Twain
Following this rule is forcing the small and dewindling group of intelligent people left in the world to cease interacting with people.
You might need to get accustomed to being alone if you're intelligent and would rather not waste your time arguing with someone who is so ignorant, that they have no chance to realize what's really going in this world.
It would seem that Dunning-Kruger has engulfed much of the population, especially in the West.
In the past I haven't posted much if anything about Charles Nenner in part because I believe it's pretty obvious he’s not someone who should be taken seriously.
If you aren't familiar with this clown I suggest you listen to some of his interviews if you're in the mood for comedy.
After only a few minutes of wasting your time I'm confident you'll conclude that he's a complete clown!
For instance, when discussing his doom and gloom narrative Nenner relates it to "cycles" and other nonsense.
Another reason I haven't bothered to feature Nenner in the past is because he hasn't landed into "mainstream media" as much as other financial charlatans.
That means he hasn't received as much exposure as his Jewish knuckle head contrarian indicator peers. And because my objective is to help main street realize the truth about the "experts" it airs, I tend to focus more on exposing the realities of those who receive the most media exposure since they reach the largest number of people.
After all, I have limited time available for this endeavor, so I need to pick and choose the charlatans and clowns I feel are most likely to cause the most harm to the most people.
Again, my main objective is to warn main street about the various tricks used by the criminal media to take their money and brainwash them.
However, Nenner has managed to land a good deal of exposure from the so-called "alternative media," which as I have previously discussed is even worse than the so-called "mainstream media."
Remember that all media, regardless whether you prefer to label it as "mainstream" or "alternative" is disinformation because it's funded by ad-based content.
You'll probably agree with this assessment once you note that many of the same clowns and charlatans promoted in the "mainstream media" as experts are also promoted as experts in the "alternative media."
As well, many of the same deceptive and fraudulant advertisements from the "alternative media" are inserted in between real news captions in order to deceive readers.
And we cannot forget the fact that the Jewish mafia runs each arm of this massive criminal propganda machine.
In reality, the differences between these two types of media have become so blurred over the past decade that I consider "mainstream" and "alternative" media as one in the same (unless we're talking about the most ridiculous instances of bat shit crazy trash such as Alex Jones, Jeff Rense, David Icke and so on. When compared to these blatant media frauds, the mainstream media looks very credible).
Let me be perfectly clear about Charles Nenner. Based on the rationale Nenner provides for his stock market forecasts, I can state with complete confidence that he has absolutely no idea how to forecast the stock market with any reasonable degree of accuracy and consistency. And his track record confirms this.
The basis Nenner uses for his "forecasts" ranges from idiotic to really weird and even creepy.
It's so apparent to me that Nenner is a clown that I would place him in the same "credibility" category as fellow Jewish forecasting BS artist, failed trader, compulsive liar and Ponzi scheme scammer Martin Armstrong.
The main difference between Nenner and Armstrong is that Armstrong does a better job conning his sheep by using buzz words and phrases that might make a naive layman think he knows what he's talking about when he makes up wild stories about "big investors" listening to his "forecasts."
I've previously exposed the reality about Armstrong, his shitty track record, his terrible performance as a commodities trader, and the BS tactics he uses to lure suckers to pony up $3000 for a 3-day "economic forum."
One would have to be quite stupid and/or very naive to fall for Armstrong's BS.
Incidentally, in case you hadn't noticed, both Nenner and Armstrong are Jewish.
As a matter of fact, I challenge anyone to provide credible evidence demonstrating that nearly every so-called expert and pundit promoted by the Jewish-run media is not Jewish!
By now many of you know where I'm going with this claim. There's a massive wave of discrimination being committed by a large group of Jewish individuals against gentiles. And it's been going on for a very, very long time. Yet, I know of no one other than myself that has mentioned it.
This discrimination offers one explanation as to why gentiles have historically not wanted Jews around. But there are other reasons as well which I will not address at this time.
Similar to most failures in the financial industry, Nenner aligned himself with the gold pumping syndicate many years ago as his market collapse "forecasts" failed to pan out.
Quite simply, Nenner needed an audience foolish enough to buy into his nonsense. And gold bugs fit the bill rather well.
After all, gold bugs have been falling for countless lies, wild predictions and ridiculous claims made by an army of precious metals hucksters for a very long time, so they've been primed to soak up an endless amount of BS from clowns like Nenner.
The methods used by guys like Nenner are actually quite easy to spot. When you can't cut it as a legit analyst in the financial industry, you'll seek out a different audience to pander to; anything to avoid getting a real job and providing real value; but only if you have no moral compass.
Sometimes these failures are so delusional that they actually come to believe their own bull shit. Thus, they don't think they're doing anything morally wrong. I would classify such a an indiviidual as being a delusional clown.
Even if you're a failure as an analyst, forecaster or whatever you might call yourself, the fact of the matter is that you can boost your newsletter subscriptions, consulting services and professional speaking business by appealing to misguided individuals, many of which are conspiracy loons who side with the doom & gloom / dollar collapse / stock market collapse / hyperinflation / soaring gold / big foot / flat earth crowd.
This crowd has grown to a very large size over the past several years, ensuring a nice pay day if you cater to their delusional beliefs.
These are often the same individuals who turn to Alex Jones, Max Keiser, RT, Zero Hedge, Peter Schiff, Glenn Beck, David Stockman, Jim Rickards, Jim Rogers, Marc Faber, Edward Griffin, Robert Kiyosaki, Mike Maloney, Doug Casey, Ron Paul, James Turk, Eric Sprott, Rick Rule, Jeff Berwick and other disinfo sources that constantly blame the government for everything.
Dedicated gold bugs are usually unsophisticated at best and pure nut jobs at worst. While many gold bugs are both naive and ignorant, there's a much smaller segment of this group that's sharp and lucky enough to escape the precious metals cult if they take the time and effort to look at things objectively, raise critical questions and demand answers from precious metals charlatans.
Even at this stage cult members can be manipulated by these professional con artists. It is indeed the rare cult member who realizes when they've been had. But reaching this stage is asking quite a lot from cult members, which is why it's rare that they ever escape.
Although there are some fairly intelligent gold bugs that possess the ability to analyze things objectively, they lack sufficient knowledge and understanding to form more rational conclusions regarding all things related to precious metals. As a result, the con artists who run these cults are usually able to convince prospectve dissenters that their thoughts are misguided.
Perhaps an even bigger hurdle faced by potential dissenters of gold cults is that there are no gold bugs I know of that truly understand the investment world, for if they did they would only utilize gold (at best) during seldom seen periods for its very limited role in the entire spectrum of the investment world.
Most investors would be acting prudently if they never bothered with gold or silver. Furthermore, such individuals would spend nearly all of their time and money focusing on real investments and the investment process. I've covered this topic many times in the past.
Getting back to Nenner....as he continued to sink into the depths of zero credibility, he wanted to generate sales for his fear-mongering "forecasts."
Hence, in order to land more interviews as a way to sell his newsletters (which I'm willing to bet became more focused on pumping gold in order to please his new audience) Nenner began spewing the kinds of ridiculous lines gold bugs were used to hearing. These are the lines that put a smile of the face of gold bugs.
And that's precisely what the gold charlatans want.
They constantly seek out sources that will help validate their myths in order to demonstrate a false consensus.
I plan on getting back to Nenner more in the near future (hopefully) if I find the time and inspiration.
For now I'll spoil the plot by telling you that I have a good deal of content revealing Charles Nenner to be one of the world's worst market forecasters.
Perhaps one reason why Nenner can't seem to get much of anything right is due to his reliance on Elliot Waves theory.
In my professional view as someone who has worked in various capacities on Wall Street and the financial industry in general for more than two decades, anyone who points to "cycles" as a way to time something is most often wrong and always clueless. This is especially true for market forecasting.
For those who might doubt my view on this I would suggest you first research my market forecasting track record. I will guarantee you won't find a better record by anyone in the world.
Note that I only added the condition of being "most often wrong" because there's always the possibility of getting lucky versus the certainty of anyone who relies on Elliot Waves, astrology, biblical scriptures and other nonsense to be clueless if not delusional.
On the other hand, maybe they know exactly what they're doing. If so, that would transform them from being a clown into a con artist.
As another example pointing to the lack of merit behind Elliot Waves, those who are familiar with Robert Prechter have seen that his use of Elliot Waves as a tool to predict major stock market moves has most often led to disaster.
Blast from the Past: If You Listened to Robert Prechter You Lost You Ass BIG TIME!
As you watch the video below, I want you to notice how the Bloomberg media scum have deceived their audience regarding Nenner's track record by stating that he "called the market top in 2007" and "predicted the real estate bubble in 2006."
In addition, I want you to notice how these bold-faced liars from Bloomberg keep posting the following lines as Nenner speaks:
"Chart Guru Who Called '07 Top: Sell Stocks Now"
"Dow 5000 Correction Begins This Year At the time the Dow was around 14,000"
Okay, so if Nenner "called the '07 top and recommended to sell stocks now," and if he claims the "Dow is headed to 5000 this year," ask yourself what you'd be thinking.
Is this not market manipulation?
Only if the media is misrepresenting Nenner's claims, his track record and his background.
Ask yourself whether or not Bloomberg verified the claims it posted regarding Nenner.
I will guarantee you no one at Bloomberg verified these claims.
How am I so sure?
Because you cannot verify something that's not true!
You see, all media organizations post what they're told by those they interview without taking the time and effort to verify the claims made by the "expert" they plan to interview.
So every time one media firm makes claims about Nenner (and these claims come from a bio Nenner sends them) future interviews at other firms feed off of these bogus claims. Before you know it Nenner's alleged track record has been formed based on what he has fed the media.
This activity ultimately leads to the creation of a track record that's not based on reality because the next media outfit that interviews Nenner will see the claims made by Bloomberg and assume that everything must be true. The fact is that no vetting takes place.
As you can imagine, over time these claims are transformed into "urban legend" status, being accepted as factual and repeated by each disinformation source that interviews Nenner.
Meanwhile, Nenner's real track record is quite different from the one he and his media buddies have helped him spread to the sheep.
In my view this type of behavior constitutes fraud. Yet, it happens on a daily basis with virtually every so-called expert interviewed in the media.
The mechanism I have described is extremely common. That is, guys like Nenner work with the media to promote track records that don't jive with reality. We see this with Peter Schiff, Jim Rogers, Marc Faber, Harry Dent and every other so-called expert in the media. It's clearly a huge problem that no one has ever addressed.
And it's the same mechanism that creates folklore from decades ago that are difficult to disprove such as "he predicted the '87 stock market crash."
As I've stated in the past, the '87 crash was absolutely NOT predictable. It was like predicting the flash crash of 2010, which was not predictable.
But of course nearly everyone latches onto this claim that this person or that person predicted the '87 crash without bothering to even question whether they did indeed do so based on hard evidence (not here say) and whether it was even a predictable event.
Just because you keep claiming a crash is going to occur year after year does not mean you were successful in predicting when it finally happened (think of Peter Schiff, Marc Faber, Harry Dent, Jim Rogers and the rest of the broken clock crowd).
But again, there was no rational basis for the crash of '87 making it possible to predict. Hence, the crash of '87 was NOT something that was possible to predict. And anyone who states anything to the contrary should be labeled as a source of disinformation.
Unlike the financial crisis of 2008 which was due to numerous activities that had been going on for many years and that resulted in a market collapse over a period of more than one year, the '87 crash was a one-day event that was not the result of identifiable activities that were going on over an extended period. It was a random event that was not precipitated by any particular event or series of events. Hence, it was not a predictable event.
Finally, remember that the 1987 crash led to the beginning of what was to become the longest bull market in U.S. history up until 2018.
So for everyone who claims to have predicted the '87 crash, you need to provide solid evidence which includes showing all of your forecasts several months prior to the crash. If you cannot show that you were not crying wolf for months and even years before the '87 crash that means you are a broken clock and you predicted nothing.
More important, you also need to provide evidence that you were not telling investors to stay out of the stock market after the crash.
If you cannot provide evidence that you recommended to buy stocks after the '87 crash and you claim to have predicted it, all that means is that you caused people to miss out on the Great Bull Market of the 1990s.
Now if you have never thought about these things in this manner before, I'd say you're probably going to have a very difficult time navigating the web of lies by the media and its experts.
Don't take offense at this. It takes a great deal of experience and expertise to see through the endless tactics used by the media. After all, we're talking about one of the most powerful and pervasive criminal operations under the umbrella of the world's most powerful crime ring known as the Jewish mafia.
As well, if you want to be positioned to even stand a chance to filter through the propaganda you need to know a good deal about the capital markets. The best way to gain a competitive advantage in understanding what's going on in the capital markets is to go through our Boot Camp series.
Remember that if the media wasn't crafty about things, it wouldn't do such a good job fooling main street. So stick with me and I'll guide you.
So did Nenner "call the top in the stock market in 2007"?
Did he really recommend to "sell stocks" in October 2007?
Maybe he did.
But the real question is what was Nenner recommending in the previous month and several months before that?
I'm willing to bet Nenner was saying the same thing for many months if not years before the '87 crash. If so, that means he's a broken clock. And it's impossible for a broken clock to accurately forecast anything.
Verification of the first claim mandates inspecting all of Nenners so-called "research" before and after 2007 so as to ensure he had not stated the same thing many times over.
Because Nenner is a fear-mongering broken clock, one should assume he claimed the market made a "top" several times prior to 2007.
In fact, I'm willing to bet Nenner himself $10,000 that he made several "market top" claims prior to October 2007.
But there's more to this analysis. From the earlier discussion on the crash of '87, you should already know the next question.
What were Nenner's recommendations after October 2007?
That is, what did Nenner recommend in November 2007 and December 2007?
What about January, February, March and April of 2008?
Moreover, what did Nenner recommend each month from October 2007 through the market bottom in March 2009?
And what were his recommendations since March 2009?
The media won't even begin to go down that road because they know Nenner is a joke and his track record sucks.
The media knows all of its "experts" are little more than snake oil salesmen at best and broken clocks at worst.
But the media is not concerned one bit about accuracy or credibility. The media's only aim is to convince its audience that it has valuable content from "experts" so you will be inclined to tune into the broadcasts and read the articles which generate advertising revenues for them. The media wins. And if you pay attention to the so-called "experts" aired by the media, I'll guarantee you're going to lose most of the time.
Later in the video you'll notice how the Bloomberg market manipulation monkeys post the following claim about Nenner:
"Predicted Dow top in 2007 (claim 1) and housing decline in 2006 (claim 2)"
I've already shown how the first claim is complete bull shit.
Hell, if you don't even agree with my argument all you have to do is check where the Dow went since that time!
In other words, if you claim the market top is in and recommend to sell stocks in 2007, but you never told people when to get back into the market, those who listened to you have missed out on 100 percent upside in the market since October 2007 as of September 27, 2019.
Verification of the second claim involves seeing evidence that Nenner had published or at least discussed a detailed analysis of the real estate bubble. But he never did.
As well, one needs to ensure that Nenner had not been saying the same thing for years. I'm willing to bet he was doing just that. Checking all of his media interviews confirms this claim.
Furthermore, you cannot just say "there's a real estate bubble" and then once everything blows up claim you predicted it. This kind of "prediction" amounts to hand waving.
It's not credible.
You need hard evidence.
You need to detail the causes.
You need to discuss the full ramifications.
You need to provide a detailed analysis similar to what I did in America's Financial Apocalypse.
Furthermore, you cannot claim to have predicted the top in the market when you never predicted the bottom and when you never told people to get back into the market.
That is, did Nenner ever tell us all when to start buying?
Where was the stock market if and when he did?
All I've heard from Nenner over the past nine or ten years is how the Dow Jones Industrial Average is poised to collapse to 5000 or lower.
Nenner has been ranting the same song and dance as the other fear-mongering broken clock charlatans.
If Nenner never came out with a market bottom call this means he has kept the suckers foolish enough to listen to him out of the stock market since 2007, which means he caused these saps to miss out on the longest bull market in US history!
You should note that since at least 2011 Nenner has been issuing largely market collapse forecasts.
What that means is that if you listened to him you may have missed out on the longest bull market in stocks in U.S. history.
You have no credibility if you continue to fear monger several years later as the market keeps rising.
Later on in the video Bloomberg posts that he previously worked for Merrill Lynch and Goldman Sachs, albeit some twenty years earlier.
The Bloomberg monkeys post this so as to make you think he is a credible source. And this tactic usually works because most people are naive and trusting.
When the typical viewer reads that he used to work at recognizable firms they instantly think of Nenner as someone who is credible.
In the past I have discussed how the media constantly makes false claims about its "experts" in order to get you to tune in since tuning in means more ad revenues.
I have also pointed out many times in the past that Wall Street firms have their fair share of clowns that in some cases rival the fringe copywriting industry scam artists.
Furthermore, we do not know whether these claims about Nenner's prior work history are completely true. For instance, Nenner may have worked as a chump at these firms. Remember that as a Jew, Nenner will be virtually guaranteed to land a job at any Wall Street firm. So he could have been hired to hold a token position simply because he was Jewish.
Alternatively, Nenner may have worked at a firm that was acquired by one Merrill or Goldman only to then be forced out soon after. So can you say that you worked at Merrill or Goldman if you really didn't?
The bottom line aside from being confident that Nenner never held a position of influence at these firms is that he is clueless. And his track record confirms this. At the end of the day, the only thing that matters is whether you have credibility and whether you have established a solid track record. Nenner has failed at both.
The only question I have at this point is which came first? The chicken or the egg?
That is, did Nenner begin his stock market collapse and gold pumping rants before he began receiving mass promotion in the "alternative media," or were his market collapse and gold pumping rants responsible for his warm welcome into the world of "alternative media" hucksters?
I'm confident I know the answer to this question.
And by now, I think you also know the answer.
Finally, note that the media NEVER reveals the full truth about its experts. It cherry-picks things in order to make these clowns seem legit.
For instance, when the various Jewish-run media entities promote Peter Schiff as some sort of "expert" they often list or mention that he worked at Lehman Brothers. But has anyone in the media ever mentioned he was suspended from the securities industry and "let go" by Lehman for being brought up on charges of defrauding customers by the National Futures Association?
Of course not!
This is all too common a theme in the financial media. Many of the regular pundits and "experts" aired on financial networks have in one form or another been booted out of the financial industry. Some have been kicked out of the industry while others were fired. The rest have failed on Wall Street (e.g. Jim Cramer, Max Keiser, the Najrarian knuckle heads, Josh Brown, etc.).
But instead of revealing the REAL reason why they went off to work in the media they make it sound as if they were successes on Wall Street and decided to "retire."
Folks, retiring means you no longer work, unless you are working for free.
Because they are deceiving people in order to generate financial gain, this qualifies as fraud.
In the past I've also pointed out how CNBC promotes Josh Brown as some expert while never mentioning that prior to launching his BS marketing campaign as the "reformed broker," he was branch manager of a firm that was shut down by FINRA for defrauding customers.
Now you know why he claims to be "reformed." By definition, if you claim to be reformed that implies that you were doing something really bad before. But then again, claiming you are reformed does not mean it is true. Remember that a tiger never changes its stripes.
The list goes on. As I've stated before, you can bet that just about every single financial "professional" on CNBC either has a very checkered past or else is a complete clown. Often you'll see clowns who have a checkered past. And that's putting it mildly. You can take that to the bank.
I'd be very interested to learn the deatils of Nenner's departure from his previous firms. I'm willing to bet he was fired. If so this is huge since you don't find many Jews getting fired from the Jewish-run financial industry unless they are complete screw-ups or else they cost the firm huge clients or a collapse in reputation as a result of something they did. Former chief economist of the now defunct Bear Stearns, Larry "cocaine" Kudlow's plight serves as a great example of this.
As I have shown many times over, it's critical to keep in mind that the media is completely controlled by a gang of very racist Jewish scum bag pedophiles who use their control over media for the benefit of Jews and only Jews. That's precisely why you only see Jewish individuals promoted as experts in the media.
The main problem is that these experts are con artists, shills, broken clocks and/or idiots with lousy track records.
It's ironic how the Jewish mafia loves to claim whites discriminate when the fact is that there is not a larger force on earth that discriminates against people than the Jewish mafia.
Mike Stathis holds the best investment forecasting track record in the world since 2006.
View Mike Stathis' Track Record here, here, here, here, here, here and here.
Check here to download Chapter 12 of Cashing in on the Real Estate Bubble.
This is the chapter that shows where Mike recommended shorting Fannie, Freddie, sub-primes, homebuilders, GM, GE, etc.
So why does the media continue to BAN Stathis?
Why does the media constantly air con men who have lousy track records?
These are critical questions to be answered.
You need to confront the media with these questions.
Watch the following videos and you will learn the answer to these questions:
You Will Lose Your Ass If You Listen To The Media
Restrictions Against Reproduction: No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning, or otherwise, except as permitted under Section 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act, without the prior written permission of the copyright owner and the Publisher.
These articles and commentaries cannot be reposted or used in any publications for which there is any revenue generated directly or indirectly. These articles cannot be used to enhance the viewer appeal of any website, including any ad revenue on the website, other than those sites for which specific written permission has been granted. Any such violations are unlawful and violators will be prosecuted in accordance with these laws.
Article 19 of the United Nations' Universal Declaration of Human Rights: Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.
This publication (written, audio and video) represents the commentary and/or criticisms from Mike Stathis or other individuals affiliated with Mike Stathis or AVA Investment Analytics (referred to hereafter as the “author”). Therefore, the commentary and/or criticisms only serve as an opinion and therefore should not be taken to be factual representations, regardless of what might be stated in these commentaries/criticisms. There is always a possibility that the author has made one or more unintentional errors, misspoke, misinterpreted information, and/or excluded information which might have altered the commentary and/or criticisms. Hence, you are advised to conduct your own independent investigations so that you can form your own conclusions. We encourage the public to contact us if we have made any errors in statements or assumptions. We also encourage the public to contact us if we have left out relevant information which might alter our conclusions. We cannot promise a response, but we will consider all valid information.