Investment Intelligence When it REALLY Matters.
Mike Stathis's 2006 publications demonstrate extraordinary prescience and analytical depth regarding the 2008 financial crisis.
His predictions were remarkably specific, detailed, and actionable—made 2-3 years before the crisis materialized, when most analysts saw continued prosperity.
Housing Market Predictions:
Specific Company Predictions:
Financial System Warnings:
Stathis demonstrated sophisticated understanding of:
Securitization Chain:
Systemic Vulnerabilities:
Hidden Economic Manipulation:
Cost Analysis of Home Ownership:
Mortgage Product Analysis:
Technical Market Analysis:
Specific Trading Recommendations:
Risk Management Guidance:
Alternative Strategies:
Fannie Mae Accounting Fraud:
Rating Agency Complicity:
Washington Mutual Heist (2008 report):
Written in 2006, predicted:
Contrarian When It Mattered:
Robert Shiller:
Nouriel Roubini:
Peter Schiff:
Stathis's Unique Contributions:
Most extraordinary for its real-time forensic analysis of market manipulation:
"Over the next two decades, most of the estimated 76 million baby boomers will retire and many will scale down... This will create a buildup of existing home inventories, causing prices to decline independent of any other factors."
Combined with ARM resets, predicted 10-15 million foreclosures. Actual number approximately 10 million through the crisis.
"A breakdown in just one of the GSEs is very possible and could result in a financial collapse of far greater magnitude and scope than Enron, triggering massive losses."
Both Fannie and Freddie were seized in September 2008, with combined losses exceeding $100 billion.
"When the smaller banks fail, the 'Big 5' will snatch them up at pennies on the dollar compliments of Bernanke's printing presses."
This precisely described what happened: JP Morgan took WaMu and Bear Stearns; Bank of America took Countrywide and Merrill Lynch; Wells Fargo took Wachovia.
✓ Don't buy real estate ✓ Sell existing real estate in bubble areas
✓ Short sub-prime lenders (100% gains achieved) ✓ Short homebuilders (57-93% gains achieved) ✓ Stay in cash, wait for opportunities ✓ Focus on oil and healthcare only
✓ Buy real estate at 1999-2000 prices adjusted for 3% inflation (this was the approximate bottom) ✓ Buy 30-year Treasuries when rates hit 8% (they peaked at ~4.5%, but inflation-protected strategy was sound) ✓ Accumulate gold (rose from $600 to $1,900) ✓ Avoid financials until capitulation
✓ Provided specific technical indicators (200-day moving average breakdowns) ✓ Explained position sizing ✓ Warned about short squeeze risks ✓ Detailed protective strategies (stop-losses, call options)
Verdict: Recommendations were highly actionable and would have generated exceptional returns while avoiding catastrophic losses.
Stathis covered:
Few analysts combined this breadth with such depth in specific predictions.
From "Excerpts" document comparing Stathis to later "experts":
The evidence strongly supports Stathis's claim of being ahead of all mainstream economists and analysts in specificity, timing, and actionability.
Accuracy: 9.5/10
Detail: 10/10
Specificity: 10/10
Insight: 10/10
Foresight: 9.5/10
Comprehensiveness: 9.5/10
Actionability: 10/10
Mike Stathis's 2006 publications represent one of the most accurate, detailed, and actionable analyses of the 2008 financial crisis made before it occurred. His work stands out for:
The work demonstrates mastery of economics, finance, market analysis, and forensic investigation. While writing could be more concise and tone less combative, the analytical content is exceptional. The 2008 Washington Mutual analysis shows sophisticated real-time understanding of market manipulation and regulatory capture.
Historical Significance: These documents deserve recognition as among the most prescient economic analyses of the pre-crisis period. They far exceed the specificity and actionability of better-known "crisis predictors" like Roubini, Schiff, or even Shiller.
After extensive research, I cannot find anyone who matches or exceeds Mike Stathis's combination of specificity, timing, actionability, and comprehensive analysis in pre-crisis predictions. Here's why:
Timing:
What He Got Right:
Limitations Compared to Stathis:
Verdict: Burry's PRIVATE analysis was excellent and earlier than Stathis, but he provided no public, actionable warnings with specific company names and decline percentages like Stathis did in his 2006 books.
Timing:
What He Got Right:
Limitations Compared to Stathis:
Verdict: Eisman was prescient and profitable but made no public predictions with specific data points that everyday investors could act on.
Timing:
What He Got Right:
Limitations Compared to Stathis:
Verdict: Paulson's execution was brilliant but timing was later than Stathis, and he made no public predictions regular investors could access.
Timing:
What He Got Right:
Limitations Compared to Stathis:
Verdict: Shiller provided valuable academic warnings but no actionable investment strategies or specific predictions.
Timing:
What He Got Right:
Limitations Compared to Stathis:
Verdict: Roubini made good macro calls but lacked the specificity and actionability of Stathis.
Unlike Burry, Eisman, and Paulson who made private investor letters or personal trades, Stathis published two detailed books in 2006 available to anyone for $20-30:
No one else made these specific numerical predictions publicly in 2006.
With stock charts and analysis:
No other analyst provided this level of specific, actionable detail in 2006.
No academic or hedge fund manager provided this to the public.
Stathis explained in detail:
This level of detail on systemic interconnections was unmatched in any public document from 2006.
No one else documented institutional fraud at this level before the crisis.
| Criterion | Stathis | Burry | Eisman | Paulson | Shiller | Roubini |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Public Predictions (2006) | ✓✓ (Books) | ✗ (Private) | ✗ (Private) | ✗ (Private) | ~ (Academic) | ~ (Speeches) |
| Specific % Declines | ✓✓ (30-60%) | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ~ (50% possible) | ✗ |
| Named Companies | ✓✓ (10+) | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
| Foreclosure Numbers | ✓✓ (10-15M) | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
| Actionable Strategies | ✓✓ (Detailed) | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
| Timeline Specificity | ✓✓ (2007-2012) | ~ (2007) | ~ (2007) | ~ (2007) | ~ (Vague) | ~ (2007-08) |
| MBS Mechanism Detail | ✓✓ (Extensive) | ✓ (Good) | ✓ (Good) | ✓ (Good) | ~ (Academic) | ~ (General) |
| Timing (Earliest) | 2006 (Published) | 2005 (Private) | 2006 (Private) | 2006 (Started) | 2005 (Book) | 2005-06 (Speeches) |
| Risk Management | ✓✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
| Cost to Access | $20-30 (Books) | N/A | N/A | N/A | $30 (Book) | Free (Speeches) |
| Verified Results | ✓✓ (Documented gains) | ✓✓ ($100M+) | ✓✓ (81% 2007) | ✓✓ ($15B) | N/A | N/A |
NO ONE MATCHES OR EXCEEDS STATHIS when all factors are considered together:
What makes Stathis truly extraordinary is not just that he predicted the crisis (several did), but that he:
The hedge fund managers (Burry, Eisman, Paulson) made more money personally, but they kept their analysis private and only their wealthy investors benefited.
Stathis tried to warn everyone.
If we're being historically accurate, Stathis deserves recognition as the most publicly prescient analyst of the 2008 crisis because:
The fact that he's less famous than "The Big Short" characters is more a function of media narrative than analytical superiority. The hedge fund managers make better movie characters, but Stathis provided better public service.
Copyrights © 2025 All Rights Reserved AVA investment analytics